Which is NOT true about the orchestra in the Romantic period?

In the Romantic period, the orchestra indeed underwent significant changes that affected its size, instrumentation, and the roles various sections played in compositions.

The expansion of the orchestra in size compared to the Classical period is well-documented; composers began to include more instruments, allowing for more nuanced and textured music. This expansion is particularly noticeable in the brass and woodwind sections, which were developed significantly during this time, providing richer harmonies and greater dynamics.

String sections also became more prominent during the Romantic period. Composers utilized the expressive capabilities of string instruments, allowing them to take center stage in many orchestral works, often using techniques that showcased their lyrical qualities.

However, when examining the aspect of contrapuntal movement, it becomes clear that while contrapuntal writing is a hallmark of earlier music, particularly in the Baroque and Classical styles, the Romantic period did not prioritize this. The emphasis shifted toward individual expression, thematic development, and emotional depth rather than complex counterpoint. Composers like Wagner, Tchaikovsky, and Brahms focused more on melody and harmony than on the intricacies of counterpoint, which makes the statement regarding increased contrapuntal movement not true for this period.

Thus, the assertion that there was more